The Justice Statement
State Courts Logo
History of State Courts
Court Governance and Administration
Construction of State Courts Towers
Join us as a Court Volunteer
List of Court Volunteers
Roles of Court Volunteers
Appreciating Court Volunteers
Training and Networking Sessions for Court Volunteers
Recognising Court Volunteers
Positions in State Courts
[For lawyers only] Common e-filing errors in eLit
How do I start a civil proceeding?
How do I file a claim against my neighbour
How do I file a Magistrate’s Complaint against a harasser or stalker
How do I file a Magistrate's Complaint?
How do I file an appeal against a sentence or order made by the Court
How do I conduct a criminal case myself
How do I apply for court records
FAQ about Night Courts
EMPLOYMENT CLAIMS TRIBUNALS
Types of Claims which the ECT can hear
Before filing a Claim
Filing a Claim
After a Claim is filed
Settlement of disputes and Appeals
Compliance and Enforcement of Settlement Agreement and Tribunal Order
SMALL CLAIMS TRIBUNALS
How do I appeal against the Registrar's discontinuance order to the Referee (Small Claims Tribunals)?
How do I enforce an order of the Small Claims Tribunals
How do I file an appeal to the High Court against the decision of the Referee, Small Claims Tribunals
How do I file for debt recovery
How do I file a claim at the Small Claims Tribunals
[email protected] Courts mobile app
Small Claims Tribunals
Virtual Tour of Courtrooms
Annual Reports 2003 to 2016
Employment Claims Tribunals
Annual Workplan Speeches
Annual Workplan Speeches and Themes
FAQs on court reporting
Legislation and Practice Directions
International Framework for Court Excellence
International Consortium for Court Excellence
Judiciary Times (newsletter)
State Courts Judgment
Judgments published by LawNet
English to Chinese - Glossary of Terms
English to Malay - Glossary of Terms
English to Tamil - Glossary of Terms
SINGAPORE GOVERNMENT WEBSITES
Community Mediation Centre
Family Justice Courts
Insolvency and Public Trustee's Office
Legal Aid Bureau
Ministry of Education
Ministry of Law
Ministry of Social and Family Development
National Youth Council
Supreme Court of Singapore
Asean Law Association
Community Development Councils
Criminal Legal Aid Scheme
SG Heart Map
Singapore Academy of Law
Singapore Children's Society
Singapore Institute of Legal Education
Singapore International Arbitration Centre
Singapore Mediation Centre
The Law Society of Singapore
What happens after a case is referred for Neutral Evaluation?
Within 21 days after a case has been referred for Neutral Evaluation, the State Courts Centre for Dispute Resolution will schedule a preliminary conference between a Judge and the parties' lawyers. At this conference, the Judge will discuss with the lawyers the following matters:
Once the Neutral Evaluation hearing date has been fixed, your lawyers must submit a concise opening statement setting out your claim and attaching all the key documentary evidence that you intend to rely on at the hearing. This must be done no later than two (2) working days before the hearing.
Who needs to be present at the Neutral Evaluation?
The parties and their lawyers should attend the hearing. The factual and expert witnesses whose identities are confirmed and agreed upon at the Preliminary Conference should attend the hearing.
In the case of corporations and other entities, any representative who has the authority to settle the case should attend the hearing. If only a board or body has the authority to settle on behalf of the entity, the entity should send the person who is the most knowledgeable about the case.
What happens at the Neutral Evaluation?
At the Neutral Evaluation hearing, the parties and their lawyers will present their respective cases and the available supporting evidence to one another and the evaluator. The key witnesses on each side will be called to testify. The usual procedural and evidential rules in a trial will not be applied strictly. Cross-examination of witnesses will generally not take place. When separate expert witnesses are called, they would give evidence using the expert witness conferencing approach, which involves a joint discussion of the expert issues amongst the experts in the presence of one another.
The evaluator may, at any time during the Neutral Evaluation hearing, ask questions to probe or clarify any submission or evidence presented by the parties and their witnesses. Where suitable, the evaluator would also identify areas of agreement or disagreement. The parties would also be given the opportunity to make their respective submissions or arguments. After all presentations and evidence have been made or delivered, the evaluator will give an oral assessment of the merits of the parties' case.
When I use Neutral Evaluation, am I able to attempt other ADR processes later?
Yes. If the parties are unable to settle their case after Neutral Evaluation, the Judge may recommend that other ADR processes such as mediation be pursued. Similarly, if the parties are unable to settle at mediation, the parties are not precluded from opting for Neutral Evaluation thereafter.
Information is easy to understand.
Information is useful.
Information is easy to find.
Tell us how we can improve this page.
Please email if you would like us to respond to your enquiries.
We will use your contact infomation for feedback related to the website only.
You are being redirected to an external source.
Do you want to proceed?
Thank you for your feedback.
Oops, that can't be blank....